View Full Version : Coookie Issue
Justar
05-15-2004, 03:31 PM
As long you're running a frameset, you're gonna get the cookies blocked by IE6. Third party cookies are a big no-no. Drop the frameset and just have legionoflions.com meta redirect to lol.compbuddy.com. Its incredibly annoying to have to either A) Login every 10 mins or B) manually go to the lol.combuddy site.
spyder913
05-15-2004, 04:42 PM
or read the sticky above this post and fix it in 30 seconds!
spyder913
05-15-2004, 04:42 PM
and it's not a frameset, it's a virtual host
Justar
05-15-2004, 05:11 PM
and it's not a frameset, it's a virtual host
Looks like a frameset to me.....could be a virtual host on your end, but the html it generates is pure frames.
Edit: From a development standpoint, its "bad form" anytime you leave the URL the same and navigate the site. Sure, it looks nice to see LegionOfLions in the URL, but it sure is a bitch to direct link to any of the forums/threads inside the domain.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Frameset//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/frameset.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Legion Of Lions</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="keywords" content="lol,legion of lions,UT Clan,morety,Unreal Tournament">
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow">
<meta name="description" content="Home of Clan Legion of Lions. Morety and Hammer lead the clan. LoL and Boom Rooster">
<meta name="generator" content="Domain Direct Forwarding">
</head>
<frameset framespacing="0" rows="100%,*" cols="100%" frameborder="no" border="0">
<frame name="DDIRECTXYZZY2" scrolling="auto" src="http://lol.compbuddy.com" noresize>
<frame name="DDIRECTXYZZY" scrolling="no" noresize>
<noframes>
<h1><a href="http://lol.compbuddy.com">www.legionoflions.com</a></h1>
<p>Please <a href="http://lol.compbuddy.com">click here</a> to view the non-framed version.</p>
<hr>
<p>Home of Clan Legion of Lions. Morety and Hammer lead the clan. LoL and Boom Rooster</p>
</noframes>
</frameset>
</html>
spyder913
05-15-2004, 06:40 PM
I agree. I think it's a dumb way for the hosting co to do it.
Rooster
05-15-2004, 08:04 PM
I told Morety it was much better to buy the domain. Hell, I think Protollix will even pay for the name and upkeep as long as we're here.
I say let's do it. (I just thought about the Protollix paying the upkeep!).
What do ya think m0? It's not like the money's gone to waste.
Rooster
05-18-2004, 09:58 AM
And it's not the actual Web host that does it, it's the domain forwarding host.
vBulletin v3.6.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.